Search for: "In re Marriage of Richards"
Results 181 - 200
of 409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Judge Richard Posner minces no words. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
In 1967, we represented Mildred and Richard Loving in their successful fight to end state bans on inter-racial marriage, in the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:23 am
Maybe the Texas Supreme Court is reading this opinion right now and thinking about deciding the Texas state case In re J.B. out of the Dallas court on the validity of same-sex marriages and the right of Texas to grant a same-sex divorce. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:23 am
Maybe the Texas Supreme Court is reading this opinion right now and thinking about deciding the Texas state case In re J.B. out of the Dallas court on the validity of same-sex marriages and the right of Texas to grant a same-sex divorce. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
Maybe the Texas Supreme Court is reading this opinion right now and thinking about deciding the Texas state case In re J.B. out of the Dallas court on the validity of same-sex marriages and the right of Texas to grant a same-sex divorce. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 10:21 am
At Tuesday’s oral argument before the Seventh Circuit, Judge Richard Posner shredded two states’ defenses of their laws excluding gay couples from marriage. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re notes that “a significant chunk of the briefing” in Heien v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re examines the Court’s treatment, in Burwell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re considers the Court’s discussion of relative standing in Clapper v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
If they come back they’re yours; if they don’t, they never were. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:01 pm
In November, two Governor Snyder appointees are facing re-election, and a third seat is opening-up via the retirement of Justice Michael F. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
At PrawfsBlawg (cross-posted at Re’s Judicata), Richard Re compiles a list of law review articles cited in recent Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the process by which the Court announces its opinions – a process, he suggests, that “help[s] to define the Court’s distinctive institutional role. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:19 am
“When they’re changing the wording of opinions, they’re basically rewriting the law. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:00 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re notes recent events, including errors in two recent dissenting opinions, and suggests that “in small but meaningful ways, the Court is being forced to acknowledge its own fallibility. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
As Graber notes, my political account ends with the resignation of Richard Nixon, and a lot has gone on since then. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:57 am
[Senator Richard] Blumenthal... said he found it “incredible … that you would not understand that this amendment would put doctors at risk. [read post]
13 May 2014, 11:50 am
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Boggs declined to reveal his positions on abortion rights and marriage, saying they're "irrelevant" to how he'd act as a federal judge and that it would be "inappropriate" for a judge to discuss personal views. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
As Richard Wolf put it in his USA Today preview last week, the case is full of hot-button issues such as religious freedom, corporate rights, federal regulation, abortion and contraception. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:28 am
In order to re-establish the correlation between substantive law and the choice of law rules, the paper identifies leading theoretical features of modern-day marriage law, including the principle of party autonomy. [read post]
