Search for: "In re Nina S."
Results 181 - 200
of 581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2017, 2:06 pm
He is attacking them because they're kneeling during the national anthem. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:26 am
(Thanks to Professor Nina Chernoff for suggesting this case for inclusion in this week’s newsletter.) [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 1:45 pm
One way to help get the other person to take a position or action is to make them feel good, according to an article in Lifehack by Nina Bonander. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 5:43 am
It feels like we’re hearing more about it of late. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports that in its decision Monday in Sessions v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:30 pm
Steve Bright with Nina Totenberg In 1991, I was still yearning to re-direct my career from the 25-lawyer corporate law firm that I had joined two years earlier , to something more meaningful. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
That investigation may or may not need your client’s help, Nina. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 7:04 pm
I know what you’re thinking. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:01 am
If you’re trying to take all of that in, take another moment. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at the Supreme Court’s practice of abandoning “longstanding or widespread readings of its own precedents by blaming a dissenting opinion. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:45 am
The Dialogue Begins Dan Schwartz: So Nina, our first post was such a hit that I think we’re due for an encore. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
At the Associated Press, Denise Lavoie and Michael Tarm report that Gorsuch’s “worker’s rights opinions are often sympathetic but coldly pragmatic, and they’re usually in the employer’s favor,” noting that a “review of dozens of employment cases he heard in his decade on the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals reveals a focus on texts and a fondness for scrutinizing definitions of words in legislation and the… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:08 am
Fisher’s customers, all of whom presumably wanted to see it. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:18 am
Nina: Ha! [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am
Briefly: At Prawfsblawg, Richard Re discusses the court’s recent decision in Lightfoot v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm
RE-1, No. 15-827. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 2:38 pm
We’re interested in why you started this project. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps also discusses Moore, observing that this “kind of ‘you’re not serious’ case is a subtle but significant challenge to the Supreme Court’s authority. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
We’re either not smart enough, not creative enough, not something enough. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” At The Hill, Alexander Bolton reports that “Hillary Clinton will face a tough decision on the Supreme Court if she wins the presidency on Tuesday,” because she will have to choose between re-nominating Chief Judge Merrick Garland or succumbing to pressure from the left “to jettison Obama’s centrist nominee and pick a younger and more liberal judge. [read post]
