Search for: "In re Pohl" Results 181 - 200 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am by Wells Bennett
That takes us to the motion’s disposition by the court: it leaves open the possibility of re-filing the same challenge “at an appropriate time. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am by Wells Bennett
  Judge James Pohl has set forth 23 motions for argument: a. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:54 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Here’s an LA Times story on that ruling, the ruling by Judge Pohl, and the protective order. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:21 am by Irene
 If re-elected, President Obama may have other plans for this country’s high-value al Qaeda captives. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:10 pm by Dan Gauss
 There are other examples, but the point is that the commissions often act and look like they’re feeling their way in the dark. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:37 am by Wells Bennett
 Judge Pohl will have to address both. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:21 am by Wells Bennett
  Judge Pohl stops him and cites two barriers to the defense’s request. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:36 pm by Benjamin Wittes
We’re back and taking up AO 77, the defense motion to compel the funding of another defense consultant, one Dr. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
We’re only after generic identification, Kammen argues. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:30 am by Kevin
If you want to drive your Flintstones car in Germany, you're going to have to choose between safety and authenticity. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:09 am by Benjamin Wittes
You’re kind of aware of where those lines are. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:17 am by Wells Bennett
I don’t know whom you’re talking about, Judge Pohl says, but the answer is also no. [read post]
5 May 2012, 3:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes
You’re swearing to make your best effort to represent your client. [read post]
5 May 2012, 2:31 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Is that what you’re telling me, Judge Pohl asks? [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:21 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Request noted, and we’re back to the right to counsel. [read post]