Search for: "In re S. W. (1978)" Results 181 - 200 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 8:49 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
In addition, he emphasized why the method of breeding thoroughbred horses is the source of many of the industry’s problems. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
But many default judgments in collection cases brought on consumer debt in Texas are never challenged, and many old judgments containing hefty attorney’s fees re-surface years later when the creditor (or its assignee) files an application for a writ of garnishment to freeze and seize a judgment-debtor’s bank account.ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent.No. 16-0006.Supreme Court of… [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:50 am by Russell Knight
“DOCUMENTS TO PRODUCE With respect to the attached Notice to Appear, you are to produce the following: Petitioner’s Updated Financial Affidavit;Petitioner’s checks, W-2’s, 1099’s and other documents or records reflecting income received from Petitioner’s business from February 12, 2016 through the present;Bank Account Statements for each bank account held in Petitioner’s name from February… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
To paraphrase what the late great Professor David Gregory said: "[W]hat the state courts say is not the law. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
A special prosecutor is not the same as an independent counsel, whose appointment under a portion of the Ethics in Government Act passed in 1978 required the involvement of the courts. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
For this reason we have suggested a cautious approach to inter-nuclei communication characterized by a willful awareness by tribunals in one sphere of international law of what goes on in other related spheres, and an exercise of canvassing the views expressed by other tribunals in these related spheres for guidance to inform, or test, one’s own analysis. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Pons, 434 U.S. 575, 580 (1978)). [read post]
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
The case arose from the Appellees, Kenneth W. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Jeff Gamso
  Because they're the sovereigns. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:44 pm by Joseph Allen
A draft bill was introduced in late 1978 to get comments from interested parties before the bill was re-introduced the next Congress. [read post]