Search for: "In re STATE QUESTION NO. 241" Results 181 - 200 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 4:08 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Lovaas, 241 F.3d 900, 903-04 (7th Cir. 2001) (involving sexual abuse that occurred 26 years earlier). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:02 am by PaulKostro
That is the issue we encounter here: whether the State adequately established the author of the cyber message in question. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  So there was a choice of law question – only the court held that there wasn’t. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:02 am by Andrew Dickinson
Questions of a different kind would, of course, arise if the class action judgment had been delivered, not by a U.S. court, but by a court of a State within the Brussels/Lugano Regime. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Publishers who say that all quotes require authorization are wrong and should be questioned in individual cases. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
Bush to be Deputy Secretary of State, the 'AIDS Czar' who stated that US funds should be denied to countries that permitted prostitution.[241] resigned April 27, 2007 after confirming he had been a customer of the DC Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey.[242] Glen Murphy Jr. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:18 pm
"); In re Grasselli, 713 F.2d 731, 739 (Fed. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The possibility of re-introducing subject-matter that has been deleted from a European patent or, in other words, the existence of a “cut-off” effect is one of the more delicate questions dealt with in the case law. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm by Carter Ruml
 Now, we’re disappointed to share bad news with In re Chilton, 2010 WL 817331 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Tex.) [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
“Given the proliferation of consumer filtering and choice, these kinds of interventions are of questionable efficacy. [read post]