Search for: "In re State Bar of Tex. " Results 181 - 200 of 523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Here's the QP, on which there is a 30-year-old circuit split: Whether the Federal Tort Claims Act's judgment bar, 28 U.S.C. 2676, which this Court has repeatedly said functions in much the same way as the common-law doctrine of res judicata, nevertheless operates to bar claims brought together in the same action. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:09 pm by Kate Mataya
Res Judicata The mother also argued res judicata should bar Justin from seeking paternity when he had failed to do so in the divorce case. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:00 pm by John K. Ross
First Circuit: Subject to exceptions that don't apply here, losing parties in state court don't get to re-litigate in federal trial courts. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:30 am by Allie
 They're my favorite--here are a few:    Bradshaw v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:58 am
This originally pro se mandamus petition was referred by the Court to the State Bar’s pro bono program. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
May 30, 2007), and In re Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, No. 04-0914, 2007 Tex. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
State transportation officials: We want to bring in new companies to run those routes, so we’re using eminent domain to seize your permits. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
Because the State relies on aggregate proof to establish these claims, they are barred. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:31 am by Beth Graham
See In re Morgan Stanley & Co., 293 S.W.3d 182, 190 (Tex.2009) (orig.proceeding) (Brister, J., concurring) (stating that breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and malpractice claims were based on client’s contract with broker). [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:30 pm by John K. Ross
But we're more sanguine about your chances under the state ADA equivalent. [read post]