Search for: "In re Thomas (1982)"
Results 181 - 196
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
But the efforts to measure performance in various areas of government from the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982 and the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993—and the limited efforts to make funding contingent on those performance measures—have largely passed prisons by. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
By Bob Hockett The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a fascinating case that DoL readers might find particularly interesting in a time of financial turbulence. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Thomas, decided in 1908. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Ralph Baze and Thomas C. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Navarro, April 2, 2018, Thomas, C.). [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
“Five for fighting” – The National Hockey League’s Liability for Fighting and Enforcers As the season changes to winter, many Canadians turn their attention to the national pastime: hockey. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:54 am
El resultado -cuanto menor, mejor- será una aproximación a la opinión que al lector le merezca la actuación de la Corte -una opinión que tenga en cuenta todo el campeonato y no las perlitas de los resúmenes de la fecha-. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
The Friedrich court was referring to In Re Bates, High Court of Justice, Family Division, Royal Courts of London, No. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
[A reply to Professor Andrew Koppelman] In the Arizona Law Review, Professor Andrew Koppelman asks the provocative question Why Do (Some) Originalists Hate America? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
If you can’t set aside the rule and you’re not a regulated party, how is their injury redressable in this suit and why do they have standing? [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
