Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C." Results 181 - 200 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am by MBettman
R.C. 2151.281(A)(1) (“The court shall appoint a GAL, subject to rules adopted by the supreme court, to protect the interest of a child in any proceeding concerning an alleged or adjudicated delinquent child or unruly child when . . . [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am by MBettman
McGowan was asked by her CTC patients and staff to continue this practice, which she felt constituted insurance fraud in violation of R.C. 2913.47. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am by MBettman
RC 2307.50 (civil action to recover damages for interference with the parental or guardianship interest.) [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am by MBettman
Appellee, the state of Ohio, moved to transfer Aalim to adult court pursuant to R.C. 2152.10(A)(2)(b) and 2152.12 (A)(1)(b). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:07 am by MBettman
The prosecution argued that the state has a legitimate interest in ensuring that final judgments are expeditiously enforced. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
For example, landlords of residential (vs. commercial) property must pay interest on their tenants’ security deposits greater than $50 (pursuant to O.R.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:34 am by Edward R. Weinstein
R.C., the New Jersey Appellate Division found that a carefully conducted interview can yield facts, such as, information about activities with parents, interests, friends, and living arrangements, that could be relevant to the custody determination. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:56 am by MBettman
I find it interesting that Ohio has not joined the 14 states that  invalidate a juvenile’s waiver without additional safeguards such as the presence of a parent during questioning, and wonder if the Ohio high court will take this case in on that issue. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 7:02 am by MBettman
R.C. 2961.01 describes the process of disenfranchisement and restoration of rights. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:10 am by MBettman
In a 4-3 opinion, the court struck down R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) on its face, on equal protection grounds. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
., without compulsion or duress, whether the sale [took] place in an open market, and whether the buyer and seller act[ed] in their own self-interest. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am by MBettman
Had R.C. 4117.13(D) been intended to limit jurisdiction, it would have incorporated language similar to that of R.C. 4117.02(O), which states that, for matters of public or great general interest, SERB can “certify its final order directly to the court of appeals having jurisdiction over the area in which the principal office of the public employer directly affected by the application or interpr [read post]