Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)"
Results 181 - 200
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Balikian & Cody M. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Really, I'm flummoxed here. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
And I finished up Allen Mendenhall's new book on Emerson's poetics and Holmes' dissents. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
The most recent prominent example of which I'm aware is Justice Kennedy's opinion in Lee v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am
Just last week, the Seventh Circuit had two interesting — though not dispositive — opinions on the matter, in McCarthy v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:23 pm
What I'm interested in is the dissent. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:59 am
As an interested consumer, I hereby demand a titillating en banc opinion as well. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:12 pm
LEXIS 10878 (9th Cir 5/27/2011) (denial en banc)(concurrence)(dissent) In concurrence, C.J. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
I’m glad to hear this, since I think the dissenting judge on the panel had the much better argument. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
Stevens, NY Times) How the Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Decision Affects the AAPI Community (Stewart Kwon and Connie Chung Joe, Time) Warnings of an “Unparalleled” Assault on Higher Education (Isaiah Thompson, Nonprofit Quarterly) If there are any attorneys or law students who identify as Black, Native Americans, or Pacific Islanders who are interested in nonprofit corporate and tax-exemption laws and who’d like to pursue this area of… [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
R.C. 2901.01(A)(9)(a) and (d) (Defines offenses of violence.) [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
by Dennis Crouch The copyright lawsuit between the data-software company SAS Institute and its scrappy copycat World Programming has been interesting to follow over the past several years, and the Federal Circuit has now issued a controversial opinion in the case. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
Davey, I’m sure. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
In his concurring opinion, Justice Kennedy wrote that "[i]t is important to confirm that a premise of the Court’s opinion is its assumption that the HHS regulation here at issue furthers a legitimate and compelling interest in the health of female employees. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
The researchers also showed some differences between majority and dissenting opinions. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:49 pm
Page and Helen M. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
By acting like a clone of a SCOTUS dissent, this opinion added nothing useful to enrich debates about how state law ought to be construed. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 3.04(d), at 60 (1985). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 3.04(d), at 60 (1985). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
Frankly, I found the dissent — on an entirely different issue — to be much more interesting. [read post]
