Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. S., Child"
Results 181 - 200
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2012, 2:33 am
“‘[T]he matter of visitation is so important, especially during the formative years of a child, that if a plenary hearing will better enable a court to fashion a plan of visitation more commensurate with a child’s welfare’ a plenary hearing must be required by the court even if the parties have waived it. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:24 am
Grandil, a partner at Altexis, which specializes in tax matters for corporations and the wealthy. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Even in the presence of the huge German welfare system which tries to make everyone feel as secure as possible, people routinely save money, just to be on the safe side. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Any person who violates this provision commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 am
If a single mother walked into J. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
See Moreno, 413 U.S. at 541 (Douglas, J., concurring). [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am
It will be:“ ‘Abuse’, in relation to a child, means:(a) an assault, including a sexual assault, of the child; or(b) a person (the first person) involving the child in a sexual activity with the first person or another person in which the child is used, directly or indirectly, as a sexual object by the first person or the other person, and where there is… [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
Together with Robert J. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
”); Matter of C.H., 997 P.2d 776 (Mont. 2000) (similar); and Matter of S.E.G., 521 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 1994) (similar); see also Michael J. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:52 am
I.S., 202 N.J. 145, 178-79 (2010) (concerning the importance of visits to a child’s well-being in the context of a child protective services matter); see also N.J.S.A. 9:6B-4(e) and N.J.A.C. 10:122D-1.1(a) (concerning the right of children to visitation when placed outside the home). [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:57 am
It began on May 17, 2010 when the San Joaquin County District Attorney filed a “juvenile wardship petition” pursuant to California’s Welfare and Institutions Code §602(a). [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:33 am
On Friday, the Michigan Supreme Court clarified the steps trial courts must take to ensure that the notice requirements under the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) are strictly enforced in a consolidated order resolving two cases, In re C I Morris Minor, Case No. 142759 and In re J L Gordon Minor, Case No. 143673. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:02 pm
Rohde was granted youthful offender status April 25 in the wake of a guilty plea to endangering the welfare of a child. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:15 pm
The health, safety and welfare of children are matters of public policy in California therefore the State refuses to limit a child's access to financial support or a relationship with a parent. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:19 am
[2] Letter from J. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
This Court’s opinion in Citizens United, coupled by developments in the lower courts and the Federal Election Commission, means that a large percentage of the money spent in elections will likely be unreported, and it has become child’s play for individuals, corporations (and potentially–and illegally–even foreign individuals and corporations) to hide their identities. “Enough is enough.” Cf. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
Government consultation on equal civil marriage Obiter J blogs on the government’s consultation on civil marriage, which relates to the right of same-sex couples to have equal access to marriage. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
What is required is a detailed analysis of the child’s welfare which will inherently be different in every case. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
In Re S (a child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593; [2004] UKHL 47 the House of Lords considered the justification for an injunction preventing any publication in media reports of a criminal trial of the name or any photograph of the mother or deceased brother of the child, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
J (Feb. 25, 2012) (claiming that he wants an $11,100 personal exemption per child for working families but is against a child tax credit that would be refundable, so is "innocent" of "expanding welfare"). [read post]
