Search for: "Institute For Justice v. IRS" Results 181 - 200 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Chief Justice wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Scalia dissented, joined by Justices Alito and Thomas. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
Government instituted two antitrust actions against AT & T and Western Electric Co. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
Here is how Justice Scalia described it in his dissent to the same-sex marriage decision (Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:31 am by Abbe Gluck
”  So concludes the game-changing statutory interpretation opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:55 am by Abbe Gluck
” So concludes the game-changing statutory interpretation opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in King v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Hittson’s departure was met with a short concurrence from Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Kagan, and sighs of relief from Supreme Court beat reporters grateful they’ll never have to explain it. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:52 am
 In 1993, the Supreme Court decided the case of Ratzlaf v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Last week, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the Institute for Justice and the National Rifle Association, the case was re-argued. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:19 pm
I suspect that this message will have resonance with the majority, and perhaps with some of the other Justices as well. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
Maybe Justice Breyer supported the Ten Commandments display in Van Orden v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Those regulations were overreaching, according to Dan Alban of the Institute for Justice, who was the lead attorney in Loving. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The President instructed the IRS to extend the favorable tax treatment, and he instructed the Department of Justice to refuse to defend the relevant federal law on the appellate or Supreme Court level. [read post]