Search for: "Insurance Company v. Sea" Results 181 - 200 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Adapting to rising seas and higher temperatures is expected to be a big topic at the U.N. climate-change talks in Copenhagen this week, along with the projected cost – hundreds of billions of dollars, much of it going to countries that cannot afford it. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm by bradhendrickslawfirm
Who among us hasn’t heard the joke: "What do you call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the sea? [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Fall River, MA; Liseta Vieira, President) Aj Insurance Agency Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run July 19, 2009. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
The claimant booked a sea voyage on a freighter with the sued company via the website of an agent seated in Germany. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm by The 463: Inside Tech Policy
In a sea of black hats (Wall Street, automakers, banks, and insurance companies), the tech sector still wears white. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
Two insurance companies, National Travelers and ReliaStar, disagreed about whether Coinsurance Agreements between them had terminated. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners)   Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
John DeGroote, who draws on his years of experience as chief litigation counsel for a global company as he writes the blog Settlement Perspectives, gives advice on “Non-Binding Arbitration: Get Your Day in Court Without One Day in Court“. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:41 am
"Where an insurance company was not a party to the proceeding in the division, and the judge of compensation had not determined whether plaintiff was an employee or independent contractor at the time of the accident, it was improper to exercise the division's ancillary authority to address insurance coverage. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
("Ford") and its cargo insurer, Royal Insurance Co. of America ("Royal") (collectively, "Appellants"), brought this action against Defendant-Appellee Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Wind and water are constant concerns of the buccaneer -- and of insurance companies, as Ted Frank pointed out at Point of Law.com:  "Are Insurance Companies Getting Hosed in the Wind vs. [read post]