Search for: "Interested Party State of Ohio" Results 181 - 200 of 2,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
Ohio statutes do not mandate that a court award shared parenting even in a case where the court finds that the submitted shared parenting plan is in the best interest of the children. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
Rule 28 of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure state that an oath in a video-chat or telephonic deposition may be administered by: “a person authorized to administer any oath by the laws of this state, a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending, or a person agreed upon by written stipulation of all the parties. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm by Joe Koncelik
Competitive Interest Rates-  The State did not announce the exact interest rate. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
According to the Franklin County Auditor (http://www.franklincountyauditor.com/mediation/mediation): “Franklin County's mediation program to resolve property value disputes is the first of its kind in the state of Ohio. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:06 pm
Interested parties here in the Columbus, Ohio community should be aware that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will soon start accepting cap-subject H-1B petitions. [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:07 pm
That led to our Party is Over post, when heads started rolling in the Ohio AG office. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:00 pm
I live in Ohio and have not heard anything about estate planning in my state. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am by MBettman
Co, 83 Ohio St. 3d 339 (1998) (just because a contingency fee agreement was normal and customary to the parties who entered into it does not mean it can be enforced against a party that did not agree to it.) [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:32 am
This is a high profile case on the controversial issue of mountaintop mining, involving dozens of parties Plaintiffs-Appellees Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, the Coal River Mountain Watch, and the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy (hereinafter referred to collectively as OVEC) challenge the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
 The facts of the case are as follows:Seven individual landowners (the “Landowners”) hold interests in approximately 74 acres of land in Washington County, Ohio. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
 The facts of the case are as follows:Seven individual landowners (the “Landowners”) hold interests in approximately 74 acres of land in Washington County, Ohio. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
While an entity may be a public utility outside of PUCO regulation, the State has not cited to any other potential source of law by which Ohio regulates Google. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Washington Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 113, 2015; Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 316. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the context of a shareholder derivative lawsuit, which by definition exists to serve the interests of the company, Judge Adams’s actions are directly contrary to the company’s interests. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:01 am by Brian Hall
Judge McMonagle initially rejected the plaintiffs' claims that the group rating program violated the Equal Protection clause of the Ohio Constitution, finding that the state's interest in maintaining workplace safety is a legitimate government interest that the group-rating program encourages by offering lower premiums as an incentive for employers to improve their safety records. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:20 pm by Joe Koncelik
  Any other party that has no responsibliity for contamination has a far better option under the Clean Ohio program. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Additionally, the contract does not violate the Statute of Frauds because the writing does not state a specific date of performance (i.e. closing date) or because of the failure to designate the nature of the interest being conveyed (See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:02 pm by Cheryl Cheatham
Husted (Case 2:12cv00636), United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, is the controversial “early voting” challenge receiving national attention because of Ohio’s history of being a  swing state in national elections. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 12:18 pm
The Ohio administrator submitted an answer on September 18, 1962, alleging that there are no assets of the decedent within the State of New York. [read post]