Search for: "J. DOE # 1" Results 181 - 200 of 14,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 7:35 am by Kaufman Dolowich
Notably, the law does not apply to businesses with less than $1 billion in global gross annual revenue. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:47 pm by H. Scott Leviant
”The case is not too long of a read, but it nevertheless does a thorough job of reviewing decisions addressing the Section 1 exemption (see pages 6-13 for the state of affairs). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:30 am by R0m@n_@dmin
The post How Does New Jersey Define “Serious Bodily Injury” in Assault Cases appeared first on Law Offices of John J. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” Accordingly, the circumstance that the appellant was absent from his usual residence between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2008 because he was then working in Aveiro, in the North of Portugal, does not play any relevant role in the present case. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Kevin Smith and Lindsay Colvin
Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), at 1. [3] Id. at 26 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [4] Id. at 1. [5] Id. at 4. [6] Id. at 6-7. [7] Id. at 7-8. [8] Id. at 12. [9] Id. at 33 (Alito, J., dissenting). [10] Id. at 23 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [11] Id. at 31 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Doing so would save California $1 billion over the next five years. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm by Guest Author
  In the largest study to date, the Oxford Internet Institute recently examined data from 2.4 million persons in 168 countries between 2005 and 2022, and the study’s authors conclude that the evidence does not support the hypothesis that Internet is “actively promoting or harming either well-being or mental health globally. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Kevin
The lawsuit that Orly Taitz filed last month (see “Look Who’s Back, Now Filing Lawsuits on Behalf of ‘Donard J. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, the fact that the Board has come to a different conclusion from the department of first instance does not by itself mean that the latter committed a substantial procedural violation (see for example decisions T 87/88; T 538/89, T 182/92) but is rather a matter of judgment, which does not amount to a procedural violation (see for example decision T 182/92 [7] and Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 7th edition 2013, IV.E.8.3.5). [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
The form used for the communication and the formal decision that is based on it leave open why the RS is of the opinion that Figs. 1 and 2 have been presented in a manner that does not allow electronic and direct reproduction. [read post]