Search for: "J. Doe 8" Results 181 - 200 of 6,264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden: Wyden Remarks at Section 230 Briefing Hosted by EFF (March 8, 2023)  U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Hasen, The Supreme Court and Election Law: A Reply to Three Commentators, 31 J. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:18 am by Joshua Fox and Rachel Kessler
On March 8, just three days before the National Labor Relations Board’s (the “Board”) new joint-employer standard was set to take effect, Judge J. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Haley has made clear she does not want to serve as Trump’s vice president or run on a third-party ticket arranged by the group No Labels. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Richard J. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:28 am by Guest Author
Garland, in which the Court will decide whether immigration authorities’ determination that a given set of facts does not meet the statutory standard of “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
.; nor did the Colorado Supreme Court assert (p.8) that states’ constitutional powers “to conduct and regulate congressional and Presidential elections, respectively [see Art. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The text of the percuriam and the two opinions (Barrett, J., and Sotomayer, J.) follow. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:25 am
Feb. 8, 2024 Horan, J.), the court denied summary judgment in a trip and fall case.According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff had parked in a Kohl's department store parking lot and began to walk to the store. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
It does not impact the allowability of backpay and retroactive adjustments for work performed in the current year. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, this is not quite what Cromwell J. says in Strickland, although he does say he sees “no reason to doubt” that is the case (Strickland, para. 64). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Nor can the censorship be justified simply by some "mental-health experts" being worried that speech may lead some "impressionable viewers," Appellants' Brief at 16, to behave in harmful ways—whether the speech is a violent video game, Brown, 564 U.S. at 800-01 & nn.7-8, or a dramatic program that deals with suicide. [read post]