Search for: "J. M., JR." Results 181 - 200 of 2,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Strine, Jr., and Corporate Purpose and Corporate Competition (discussed on the Forum here) by Mark J. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:22 am by Charles Sartain
And here is a well-documented review by the American Enterprise Institute’s Mark J. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 7:23 am by E. Danya Perry
In the last month, the array of investigations involving Donald J. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I’m also grateful to Jeff Abramson for his really valiant role as moderator, given the necessarily limited time available and the necessity to truncate remarks. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am by Eugene Volokh
If I'm sued for sexual harassment, fraud, or even malpractice, that would surely expose me to "shame and humiliation," even if I claim that it's unmerited because I'm actually innocent. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
Strine, Jr.; and Corporate Purpose and Corporate Competition (discussed on the Forum here) by Mark J. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
Strine, Jr.; and Corporate Purpose and Corporate Competition (discussed on the Forum here) by Mark J. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 Among contemporary theorists, William Eskridge Jr. is strongly identified with an evolving version of legal process theory. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 2:00 am by Guest Author
*This is the twelfth and final post in a symposium on William Novak’s New Democracy: The Creation of the Modern American State. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
To wit: despite that public religion discourse surrounding abortion, the Dobbs Court analysis took religionas so marginal to its analysis that the term, on its own, never actually appears in its opinions.[14]Rather, the question I’m concerned with here is whether or how we might think about doctrines (especially with the questions placed on stare decisis) that might better recognize a diversity of opinions even if one reigns supreme, while ensuring the rule of law. [read post]