Search for: "JAS v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4 The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm
” The Court cited as similar the case of Citizens for Open Government v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
I live-tweeted about the Google v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
” Examining the Harvard Law School’s compendium of Article 51 letters, it is clear that although a number of states had filed Article 51 letters in which they cited both state and non-state actor threats, relatively few states had exclusively cited non-state actor threats in Article 51 letters filed before 2001. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
[begin oral argument audio] DM: [00:08:22] JA-58 is the form. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
In other words: evidence of lies in the proceedings, a costs order must be made.Justice Boland stated the approach to be taken on costs:The relevant provisions of the Act are s 117, s 117AB and s 117C. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
This is due, Pinker states, because of two actions of the mind: chunking and functional fixity. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
New York State Depa [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
New York State Department [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:58 am
For example, where a treatment for a disease condition alleviates or reduces the need for surgical operations, hospitalization, or physician time, the expenditure on the medicine must be evaluated from a holistic perspective given that other healthcare costs have been reduced[v]. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
This memo was written for an upcoming workers’ compensation trial. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm
In Kestel v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
CARTER v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 1:04 pm
PISO 3, Carrera 7 # 40b – 36. - Miércoles 21 de marzo: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Edificio N°95, Manuel Briceño Jáuregui S.J., AUDITORIO JAIME HOYOS VÁSQUEZ S.J. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
The Whistleblower Pleading is not about a suicidal lawyer, it is about how an out-of-state bank that made bad mortgage loans in Arizona was able to obtain a horribly biased ruling in its favor. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Scarduzio states that ‘[h]umor was employed by many of the 12 judges … observed’ in two United States municipal courts. [read post]
