Search for: "Jacobs v. Jacobs" Results 181 - 200 of 2,896
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Canada On 9 May 2023, the plaintiff’s motion for a Norwich order was dismissed by Morgan J in the case of Jacobs v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The functionality or ideas that lie behind the code is protected (SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 at §20-§37). [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  His poetic inclination is perhaps the most prominent in tort cases:  As Guido reflects on one of his first opinions, Taber v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:57 am by Eugene Volokh
I wrote about the highest-profile feature of the bills—the attempt to get New York Times v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Vitulli “breached a duty owed to the shareholder independent of any duty owing to the corporation wronged” (Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; see Kramer v Meridian Capital Group, LLC, 201 AD3d 909, 911; Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608; Patterson v Calogero, 150 AD3d 1131, 1133). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
With its five guiding pillars, the Strategy codifies disparate cybersecurity actions across states and private industry by (i) advocating for legislation to protect national critical infrastructure; (ii) emphasizing threat actor deterrence and detection by officially declaring ransomware as a national security threat; (iii) proposing to shape market activity through government purchasing and proposed legislation; (iv) seeking public-private investment in cybersecurity resilience; and (v)… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 8:58 am by Chiara Gallo
 PatentsHenry Yang reported about the Interdigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539. [read post]