Search for: "Jacobs v. Major"
Results 181 - 200
of 633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2019, 6:01 am
Judge Newman agrees with Judge Pooler's analysis.In dissent, Judge Jacobs, a longtime proponent of qualified immunity, objects that the majority is asking too much of police officers to keep track of both federal and state court rulings to avoid liability in federal court. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 12:39 am
Sir Robin Jacob (UCL) on 20-24 April 2020, at UCL Faculty of Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
A Federal Court has issued a major website blocking order for GoldTV streaming websites at the request of Bell, Rogers and Groupe TVA. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 5:38 am
Tag it.State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 5:02 pm
Deadline to submit abstract: December 1, 2019 IndiaShirin R.K. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
(For those interested, see [80];[22] and [83]-[85];[144] respectively.)Minor/major scales: what was the nature of Ms Kogan’s contribution? [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
” Prosecutorial Accountability questions “some claims made by Oregon and Louisiana” in Ramos v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:34 pm
Time is moneyDoyle v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
The second major challenge to Rica that succeeded is critically important for media freedom. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says that if it had wanted to avoid this Parliament could have said so. 14:56: Lord Keen QC says the majority of the Inner House fell into error in relation to this but Lord Brody was correct in his decision. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am
In their complaint, the major labels allege RCN Telecom has been aware for years of rampant copyright infringement by its subscribers, thousands of whom they assert include repeat offenders (UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am
Martin and Jacob N. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
”[12] The Knick Court also found support for its holding in the body of takings jurisprudence, including Jacobs v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:48 am
There are three major holdings here: hostile work environment, constructive discharge and retaliation.1. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), the court majority (consisting of Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas and Kavanaugh) ruled that property owners may bring Fifth Amendment claims for compensation as soon as their property has been taken, “regardless of any post-taking remedies that may be available to the property owner,” citing Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
In Hyman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
” The majority roots its interpretation in precedent, specifically Jacobs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
That principle was confirmed in Jacobs v. [read post]
