Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2010, 2:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
Two years ago, Palmer sued the City to avoid having to either provide units for low-income tenants or pay a substantial fee in lieu of providing rent-restricted units. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 11:38 am
He raises four challenges to his convictions and sentence: that his trial violated the Speedy Trial Act, that his firearm possession convictions are multiplicitous, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that his term of supervised release was imposed in violation of United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm
She explained that the jury could have been presented with two very different cases. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
(Pacific time) in Courtroom One on the third floor of the James R. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am
This morning the Court issued its decision in the GPS tracking case United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
See Koch v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
John Jay played a key role in the early years of the fledgling United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
Flynn In the recent case of United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm
Vance Spath, begins the morning’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
Of all the matters before the Supreme Court this term, this Kat is anxiously awaiting an opinion in one pirating case: Allen v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
