Search for: "Jane Doe 1-6" Results 181 - 200 of 465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2018, 8:52 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
More than a year ago, writing with Jane Chong in May 2017, we laid out what we called, “Seven Theories of the Case: What Do We Really Know about L’Affaire Russe and What Could it All Mean? [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams-Yulee does not mark a "clear shift" in this Court's jurisprudence and does not allow for broad restrictions on judicial candidate speech [A.] [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
On the evening of December 14, 2014, Plaintiff John Doe, Jane Roe, and several of Doe’s friends, identified as “K.P” and “A.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
NPR considers whether it is possible to effectively protect your privacy as a Facebook user, as does Reuters. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit’s opinion does not discuss that theory, even though the district court had invoked it to certify the class. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654, involves an unaccompanied teenager (known as “Jane Doe” to protect her privacy) who was caught trying to enter the United States illegally. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Daniel When you need help during an emergency, you call 9-1-1—and each of your first responders has a clear role to play and works together to achieve a common goal: ensuring your well-being. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by David Luban
” Model Rules of Prof’l Conduct R. 4.1 cmt. 1 (2017). [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Affiliated Ute Does Not Apply to Claims Based Primarily on Misstatements The Second Circuit agreed with defendants that the district court should not have given plaintiffs the benefit of the Affiliated Ute Adhering to two of its prior decisions, the court held that Affiliated Ute does not apply to claims based “primarily” on affirmative misstatements, as opposed to omissions.[6] The court noted that the alleged omissions were “simply the inverse”… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
Garza, the case involving HHS’s efforts to deny a 17-year-old girl in its custody—"Jane Doe"—the right to obtain an abortion to which she was entitled under the Constitution and Texas law. [read post]