Search for: "January v. Sullivan*"
Results 181 - 200
of 411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
Alexander v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Circuit held in Meshal v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
Zwarycz successfully appealed and had his complaint reinstated by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in January 2013 (read here). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Brendan Sullivan’s virulent, scorched-earth defense of Oliver North during the televised Iran/Contra hearings is the exception that proves the rule: in addition to the fact that Colonel North as a client offered his lawyers advantages and disadvantages peculiar only to Colonel North, Sullivan made a considered tactical decision that high-profile aggression was the appropriate tack in that particular public theater. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:37 pm
This, indeed, appears to me to have been the though of the majority of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in McCarthy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Louis V. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
On January 29, 2015, this Court entered an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Reinstatement [6] of Cure and Denying Defendant’s Motion for Declaratory Relief (dkt. #89), directing Foss to pay for the trial SCS. 16. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:19 am
As articulated in 1983 by the Supreme Court in Dirks v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
One morning in January 2006, staff at a public computer facility located in a University of Arizona library received more than fifty, automatically generated, virus-alert messages from one of the facility's computers over the course of several minutes. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The emails that the IRS belatedly said are “lost” just happen to fall within the time frame from January 1, 2009, and April 2011, the relevant period. [read post]
23 May 2014, 8:54 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
