Search for: "John/Jane Does 1-2" Results 181 - 200 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
This cost underestimates the true cost as it does not include the cost of weather delays on airline customers, e.g., from lost productivity, wages, etc. 1 Since June 2003, carriers that account for at least 1 percent of domestic scheduled passenger revenues have reported the cause for both flight cancellations and/or delays in the categories of weather, carrier, national airspace system (NAS), and security. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:03 am by Susan Brenner
If it weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him that the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 367.3, just enacted in 2019, adds to that: A protected person who is a party in a civil proceeding may proceed using a pseudonym, either John Doe, Jane Doe, or Doe, for the true name of the protected person and may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the protected person. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by John J. Sullivan
”  Now, sometimes there’s a John or a Jane Doe, but we know that those are there as placeholders until the actual party is identified and then named.This leads us to the recent decision in Doe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Obstetrics & Gynaecology 961 (2019); Edward Purssell & Niall McCrae, “A Brief History of the Systematic Review,” chap. 2, in Edward Purssell & Niall McCrae, How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review: A Guide for Healthcare Researchers, Practitioners and Students 5 (2020). [2] John P. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm by Alexandra L. Arko
To learn more about how anonymous individuals on the internet are unmasked, check out our article on John Doe lawsuits. 4.) [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
" {These conditions are: (1) Places the student in reasonable fear of harm to the student's person or property. (2) Has a substantially detrimental effect on the student's physical or mental health. (3) Has the effect of substantially interfering with a student's academic performance. (4) Has the effect of substantially interfering with the student's ability to participate in or benefit from the services, activities, or privileges provided by a school.} [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:46 pm by familoo
Before the next hearing you JANE DOE must do the following : Send a statement to the court and the other party Mr BLOGS by 4pm on DATE Send a letter from your GP to the court and the other party Mr BLOGS by 4pm on DATE Before the next hearing you JOHN BLOGS must do the following :  Send a statement to the court and the other party Ms DOE by 4pm on DATE Prepare written questions for the court to ask JANE DOE on your behalf at the next hearing… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Venkat
I wonder whether the result would have been different if the lawyer in question sent a friend request that expressly addressed the ex parte issue--e.g., "I'm John Doe, counsel for Jane Doe, and I'd like to speak with you about this matter. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
Historically, the courts have also recognized that the legal process does not apply in the same fashion to the president, as it does to other government officials. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On appeal, defendants argued, among other things, that (1) the district court imposed an improper burden by requiring “conclusive evidence”; and (2) the district court erroneously rejected defendants’ rebuttal. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Subsequently, the employer filed suit in state court against two building residents, Internet service providers, 20 anonymous John and Jane Does, and three former employees. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
  The appeal was allowed by a majority of 2:1. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:08 am by Quinta Jurecic
Deadlines: Applications are due on March 1, 2017. [read post]