Search for: "Johnson v. Stevens" Results 181 - 200 of 665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
(Photo by Steven Ferdman/SIPA USA)] The popular Grand Theft Auto V computer game has two characters allegedly based on Lindsay Lohan and on Karen Gravano (Mob Wives). [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
The King Law Reporter will be available on Fastcase.com for free through February 2018. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Hoping to blame Pacific Gas & Electric power lines for Northern California fires, lawyers from coast to coast descend on wine country [Paul Payne, Santa Rosa Press-Democrat] Courts should police lawyers’ handling of class actions, including temptation to sweep additional members with doubtful claims into class so as to boost fees [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Reilly Stephens on Cato certiorari amicus in case of Yang v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:10 am by Walter Olson
“Baseball rule” win for Yankees at appeals court: “Court Rules Against Fan in New York State Foul-Ball Case” [Zach Spedden, Ballpark Digest] More on the downfall of the $417 million baby powder verdict against Johnson & Johnson [Steven Boranian/Drug & Device Law, Robert H. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie reports on Monday’s oral argument in Epic Systems v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Kevin Johnson had this blog’s preview. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
The judge begins the opinion by explaining that “Plaintiff Jason Steven Molthan has filed this pro se actionunder 42 U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
For example, Justice John Paul Stevens, a liberal, strongly condemned the Court’s 1989 decision to allow flag burning in the Texas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Epic Systems v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]