Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 5:49 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148 regarding unconscionability analysis of class action waivers in arbitration agreements. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:30 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Johnson Controls Canada, the question before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was whether Restricted Stock Units formed part of an employee’s termination pay despite the employment contract indicating otherwise. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:30 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Johnson Controls Canada, the question before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was whether Restricted Stock Units formed part of an employee’s termination pay despite the employment contract indicating otherwise. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:06 pm by jason
The superior court reversed and the Court of Appeals certified three questions to the Supreme Court 1. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:30 pm by Ad Law Defense
Superior Court, 42 Cal. 4th 443 (Cal. 2007), the California Supreme Court held that a class-action waiver in an employment contract was unenforceable when the waiver would prevent employees from vindicating their rights. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:56 am
Where such malfeasance is not present, we agree with the Superior Court that the Murray standard strikes the appropriate balance between privacy and law enforcement. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
All five justices agreed to uphold Johnson Superior Court's handling of Overstreet's case, dismissing other arguments including that Overstreet had had ineffective counsel. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
However, it was noted that the Pennsylvania Superior Court had decided a number of cases in this regard, including the case of Boyle v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 3:28 pm
[Updated 3/26/07] The Indiana Court of Appeals will hold oral argument in the case Sergio Campos v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 10:30 am
San Diego Community College Dist. (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 977, 992; Johnson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Hills and Ridges DoctrineOver the past year, one court addressed the issue of whether the Hills and Ridges Doctrine should be applied where a Plaintiff fell in an area that was covered by an awning or a canopy.In the case of Johnson v. [read post]