Search for: "Jolly v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(Wake)(Jolly): Class action against a company which provides copies of medical records, for which Plaintiffs allege it overcharged in violation of North Carolina state law. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in Conley v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
David Maxwell-Jolly, Director of the Department of Health Care Services, State of California (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:57 pm
, cited above, § 73; and see also X v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
United States Issue: Does United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:35 pm
Judge Jolly granted the Motion to Disqualify, stating that the prior representation presented the "substantial risks contemplated under Rule 1.9" of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, and that "it is the court's duty to resolve any and all such risks in favor of disqualification. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
See Jolly v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:44 am
(Wake)(Jolly): Dissolution of dental practice. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 12:26 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:09 am
Clinton Smith, a man sentenced to die in 1998 for the death of his daughter, was ordered off death row last week by state Supreme Court judge John Jolly, Jr. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 11:39 am
Much like the case of Real Color Displays, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
As the student post has described, the 9th Circuit recently held in Betz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:48 pm
Sept. 15, 2008)(Jolly) As the North Carolina Business Court framed the issue in its opinion yesterday in Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:59 pm
That's the message of a short ruling today in Velocity Fiber Broadband, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
On August 5th, in Hamm v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
Today, Judge Jolly ruled on a Motion to Dismiss in Essa Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:12 pm
Compare this case with United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:58 pm
Voyager Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
Because we hold that, under the unusual circumstances of this case, the district court lacked federal question jurisdiction, we VACATE the district court's judgment and REMAND with instructions that the case be remanded to te custody of the state court.Bernhard v. [read post]
