Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders"
Results 181 - 200
of 738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
State of Indiana - "Appellant-Defendant Thomas Jones ("Jones") appeals his conviction for Class D felony possession of a narcotic drug in Marion Superior Court following a bench trial. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 12:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:15 pm
Jones and State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 7:44 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
A state trooper from the Department of Public Safety (DPS), conducted an investigation and prepared an investigative report of his findings. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
" Jones v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The officers were not parties to the civil claim and had declined to give evidence at the trial due to fears for their own safety following the release of their identities into the public domain by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, now the Independent Office for Police Conduct. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
Hill had violated no law (except maybe public decency?) [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
Eugene Volokh at the Volokh Conspiracy recaps Saturday’s Washington Post piece on one public relations firm’s response to the Citizens United ruling, writing that the steps taken by Murray Hill, Inc. to run for political office reflect an effort to demonstrate that because corporations cannot run for office, they should not be able to contribute money to political campaigns. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
A reasonable jury could find that the officer agreed to stop plaintiff's car without reasonable suspicion or probable cause, although there was no evidence that the officer who executed the traffic stop shared the greater conspiratorial objective.Otto-Jones v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Olson; and Paula Jones’s case against President Bill Clinton, Clinton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:15 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Both “are Mexican corporations, are not registered in Texas or any of the United States, and do not have any offices, employees, agents, or representatives in Texas. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
The public defender is not assigned to the case and the individual has not hired a private criminal defense attorney.The individual decides to waive their right to counsel so the case can be resolved that day. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Department of State, and Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
For the reasons described below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of qualified immunity with respect to Defendant officers and DISMISS Defendant nurses' appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 08a0324p.06 2008/08/28 USA v. [read post]
