Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders"
Results 181 - 200
of 738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
In the case of Doe v Dowling [2019] NSWSC 1222 Fagan J entered judgment for four anonymised plaintiffs in the sum of $150,000 each in respect of defamatory internet publications making sensational and salacious allegations of a sexual nature. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
In Zervos v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
For instance, a police officer (or sheriff’s deputy or state trooper) can pull someone over here in Texas and place them under arrest. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 7:44 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:13 pm
Jones (2012), cellphone searches in Riley v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 3:05 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
Jones (2012) had a similar effect. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 3:16 am
After a grand jury refused to indict Jemison for defending herself, it indicted Jones for manslaughter instead. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 9:09 am
” The court summarizes: the Supreme Court has firmly rejected any notion that a nonresident defendant’s “doing business” in a forum state is sufficient, in and of itself, to subject the out-of-state defendant to the general personal jurisdiction of the forum state Specific jurisdiction: The plaintiff primarily relied on the Calder v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
” The first is United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Christopher Liu, Senior Assistant Prosecutor, City of Cincinnati, for Appellant State of Ohio David Hoffmann, Assistant Public Defender, Office of Hamilton County Public Defender, for Appellee Joseph Jones State’s Argument The answer to the certified question should be no, and the First District should be reversed. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Jones that filing a civil suit would not. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
No adequate evidence was produced showing that the plaintiff intentionally provided wrong information to the Copyright office, or if certain information was provided to the Copyright office, such registration would have been denied.Thirdly, the question of abandonment and relinquishment of copyright due to certain public statements made by the Plaintiff was under contention. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
If opinions from the Lone Star State's highest court such as the one just handed down in Scripps NP Operating LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
The parties also dispute whether a criminal defendant can raise a new Fourth Amendment suppression theory for the first time on appeal. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am
Jones . . . and regarding cell phone searches incident to arrest in Riley v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
