Search for: "Judicial Correctional Services Inc" Results 181 - 200 of 828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In January, the ACLU, the ACLU of Georgia, and the Southern Center for Human Rights filed a federal lawsuit against DeKalb County, Georgia, and for-profit company Judicial Correction Services Inc. on his behalf. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 8:37 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
., Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:17 am by PaulKostro
It is only upon the predicate of a determination that there has been a manifest miscarriage of justice, that corrective judicial action is warranted. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am by Ken Shigley
Pew’s team was assisted by the Crime and Justice Institute and Applied Research Services, Inc. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am by Barry Sookman
   The decision of Arnrold J. in Cartier was followed by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Search engines The ICO has, since Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) (‘Google Spain’) considered claims from data subjects about the lawfulness of the processing of their personal data by search engines. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:31 am
The Public Service Commission of WY and Silver Star Comm., Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
Robert Angel Builder, Inc., No. 126,995-B, 26th Judicial District Court, Bossier Parish, Louisiana. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Abbasi and Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
On the federal side, then, we see unanimity against arbitration based on waiver while on the state side two appellate courts overrule one trial court and established the opposite position as the “correct” decision on the question presented.But if the decision-making unit is redefined as the participating judicial decisionmaker (as opposed to the court as an institution), there is no longer unanimity on either side. [read post]