Search for: "Justice v. State Compensation Director"
Results 181 - 200
of 672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The appeal considered whether the Director of the Serious Fraud Office could issue a notice pursuant to section 2(3) of the Criminal Justice 1987 requiring a foreigner to produce material held overseas. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In Bliss v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM (Scotland) was heard on 9th April. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices French, Fischer, and former Justice DeGenaro* * Justices French, Fischer, and DeGenaro would have accepted both propositions of law. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
Fox stated during an OFCCP update webinar presented on April 11, 2012, by the National Employment Law Institute (NELI). [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
Supreme Court have undermined consumer and plaintiffs access to justice, including the decision of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:12 pm
USA v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 8:14 am
McFarland Professor of Law and co-director, Deborah L. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
A nine-member board, chaired by the Chief Justice of the United States, determines its basic policies. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Case Co. v. [read post]
Del. high court says undisclosed post-merger role made Tower CEO self-interested, board ill informed
12 Jul 2020, 5:40 pm
July 25, 2019) The majority of the en banc court said at the motion-to-dismiss stage, the undisclosed prospect of a post-merger CEO job with a five-fold pay increase for Towers’ lead negotiator would have been a conflict-of-interest concern if revealed to his board – especially since Haley subsequently supported a minimum price increase , Justice Karen Valihura, writing for the majority, said the high court’s standard for a duty of candor charge, stated in… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:47 pm
Related Blog Posts: Maryland Law Requires Medical Malpractice Plaintiff to File the Claim With the State Before Filing Suit - Haskins v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am
Shoesmith, R (on the application of) v OFSTED & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 642 (27 May 2011) – Read judgment In April 2005, Sharon Shoesmith was appointed as Director of Children’s Services at Haringey London Borough Council. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:35 pm
The case is L.W. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Rosenberg, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, February 2, 2019 Tags: Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, No-action letters, Rule 206, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation Pay Ratio Disclosure at the S&P 500 Posted by Maureen O’Brien, Segal Marco Advisors, on Saturday, February 2, 2019 Tags: Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Executive… [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
