Search for: "KEY v. LONDON" Results 181 - 200 of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2020, 6:23 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In Uddin v London Borough of Ealing (UKEAT/0165/19/RN), the EAT held that Lord Wilson’s analysis applied not only to the reason for the dismissal under the 1996 Act, s 98(1) but also to the reasonableness of the dismissal under section 98(4). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
The test in Proudfoot v Hart was of ‘tenantable repair’. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am by CMS
  His introduction covered three key points: Under general law, a claim for breach of a statutory duty is not actionable per se and requires proof of harm. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:15 pm
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), which keyed off blight designations. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 10:46 am by Giles Peaker
Tiemo, R (on the application of) v Lambeth London Borough Council (2020) EWHC 1193 (Admin) A interim judicial review decision from May, but judgment just out. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
   The leading case in the UK post pregabalin is Eli Lilly v Genentech [2019] EWHC 387, where Arnold J also found that the plausibility threshold was not met.The key take home message is that plausibility is alive and well in the UK. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
GuestKat Thomas Key reported on a recent decision by the US Supreme Court in Allen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:49 am by Giles Peaker
R(Cort) v London Borough of Lambeth (2022) EWHC 1085 (Admin) While in some ways this is a decision on an historic context (hopefully), there is a lot in this judgment on local authority approaches to housing in a public health emergency to consider. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In R (ZH &CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham; the Court ruled by a 5-2 majority that Newham and Lewisham were entitled to evict the appellants from the Housing Act 1996, s 188 accommodation without obtaining a court order. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
Back in December 2008 Mr Justice Arnold delivered a major trade mark infringement and passing off judgment in Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 6:03 am by Alexandre Miura
It will identify and consider the main legal rules in key European jurisdictions, focusing on changes introduced by the EU Trade Secrets Directive. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:55 am by Laura Sandwell
A disparity between Serco’s records of delivering prisoners ready for court – a key element of measuring contract performance – and the actual situation had become apparent. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:30 pm
 This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees, EA/2015/0269. [read post]