Search for: "Kay v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am by NL
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:59 am
United States (1949) 336 U.S. 440, 69 S.Ct. 716, 720, 93 L.Ed. 790, 796 concurring opinion. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Although Doherty had not been decided at the time that Kay & Price was, the ECtHR analysis of Kay (in Kay v UK) took the somewhat unusual step of referring to Doherty and finding that not only did the Gateways as outlined in Kay & Price not fulfil the requirements of Article 8, but neither did they as functionally expanded (albeit slightly) in Doherty. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Times reported late last week thatThe Orange County district attorney’s office on Friday charged 11 defendants with conspiring to disrupt a meeting and a speech by the Israeli ambassador to the United States at UC Irvine last year....In a statement, Orange County Dist. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
The judgment handed down yesterday, Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) was a public judgment and was said to be expressed in muted or anodyne terms by the Lord  Justice Maurice Kay. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:52 am by admin
  Judge Kays noted that that “the public policy behind the FCA is to protect the United States from ‘all fraudulent attempts to cause the Government to pay out sums of money. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am by Nabiha Syed
CACI International and Titan Corp., which considers whether private contractors working overseas for the military can be liable for torture committed at Abu Ghraib – the Court invited the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
Kay v UK: the general principles It can, then, be of little surprise that the ECtHR found the UK in breach of those same requirements in Kay. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am by Sheppard Mullin
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court, updating the application of the cumulative advances in antitrust economics as applied to vertical restraint cases, overruled the venerable Dr. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am by James Hamilton
Senator Kay Hagan (D-NC) was pleased to see that the Volcker Rule as modified by the Dodd-Frank Act will permit banking entities several years to bring their full range of activities into conformance with the new rule. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am by Adam Wagner
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:27 am by INFORRM
” which points out that the Act is unnecessary as these judgments are never enforced in the United States in any event. [read post]