Search for: "Kind v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 9,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Hill in the category of citizens protected from capital punishment by the 2002 United States Supreme Court decision Atkins v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien,… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm by Wells Bennett
What, if anything, do developments in the military commission case of United States v. al-Nashiri portend for Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am by Barbara Shreero
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:15 am by INFORRM
The applications were lodged after Edward Snowden revealed the existence of surveillance and intelligence sharing programmes operated by the intelligence services of the United States and the UK. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:06 am by Walter James
EPA, out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]