Search for: "King v. Cross"
Results 181 - 200
of 857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
(NYC Civil, Kings Co., decided 9/15/08); Lenox Hill Radiology, PC, a/a/o Busanet v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
On September 30, 2009, the plaintiff filed DD v SK and MR, in Supreme Court, Kings County, bearing Index Number 24694/2009. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
A reminder to practitioners that when determining preliminary issues such as the meaning that words convey, context is king. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
Mujo v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 12:18 am
Insignia Financial Group Inc., defendant-appellees
NEW YORK COUNTYAttorney's FeesFormer Attorney Denied Additional Fees; Clients Granted Cross-Motion for Refund of Fees Paid Veneski v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:39 pm
Cross-posted from Danzig U.S.A.Die Preußische StaatsbibliothekThe Prussian State LibraryAlong Unter den Linden in Berlin, some distance east of Brandenburger Tor but considerably west of Alexanderplatz and Fernsehturm, stands the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 10:31 am
Syria reopened a key border crossing with Jordan on Monday as a sign of President Assad’s gains in re-establishing control over the country. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Citing a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Francis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
.* Cross-Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property: at last, the book reviewEarlier this month, Jeremy posted an announcement concerning the publication of The Research Handbook on Cross-Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:54 am
" See Hamilton-King v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:59 am
King (1991) 228 CA3d 604, 616; Neal v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
The hospital cross-appealed against the award for the two own-egg surrogacies. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Kathryn Rubio (Above The Law) spotted this item in a Utah Supreme Court case from last week, Barneck v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:32 pm
First, in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am
C. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 am
University of Pittsburgh law professor David Garrow -- who won a Pulitzer Prize for Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and contributes to the civil rights trivia discussion here at the faculty lounge -- has a review of Dale Carpenter's Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
See Grutter v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:40 am
McGuiness Condos LLC
KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice
Tenant Granted Cross-Motion to Deny Landlord Restoration of Proceeding to Court's Calendar
Norgate Development Associates v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 12:10 am
A pleading that simply avers the substantive elements of inequitable conduct, without setting forth the particularized factual bases for the allegation, does not satisfy Rule 9(b).3 See King Auto., Inc. v. [read post]
