Search for: "King v. People"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2009, 12:27 pm
That crime would have been designated the principal term and received a full four-year sentence.The consecutive sentence for the King attempted robbery would have been eight months (one-third of the two-year middle term).After these calculations, the second box would be complete and contain the total sentence for all the determinate sentence crimes. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:49 am
In Stanton v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
The Supreme Court will hear King v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:54 pm
Several people filed objectants claiming lack of due execution, lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, and fraud. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:37 pm
Several people filed objectants claiming lack of due execution, lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, and fraud. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People as was established in People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:35 pm
A Supreme Court (Kings County) judge in People v Smothers (20 Misc 3d 654[Sup Ct, Kings County 2008]), has issued a decision, which interprets Grajales and 710.30 as requiring the People to give 710.30 notice of their intent to offer in-court identification testimony of any witness who has previously identified the defendant in a photo-array or other photographic identification procedure, notwithstanding the People's lack of intent to offer… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
King v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
King v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm
(Hat tip: H-Law) Marc Lender discusses his book on Gitlow v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Matiangai V. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:14 pm
This interpretation views King through the lens of the joint dissent in NFIB v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 5:12 am
Garner and Graham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
And while a lot of people have written things about Maryland v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:58 am
King County, 158 Wn.2d 1 (2006)). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
King) that the Second Amendment was applicable to state and local governments. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
We were, after all, a nation of revolutionaries, unhappy with our experience with the King and very much unwilling to subject ourselves to the resulting tyranny -- or to allow a similar thing to transpire in our new nation. [read post]
