Search for: "Kingston v. Kingston"
Results 181 - 200
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2013, 4:41 am
The question comes to mind as I watch the growing awareness and discussion surrounding the January 2013 decision of R. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
In that event the applicant’s rights are reinforced in two ways: first, by requiring the reviewing officer to give advance notice of a proposed adverse decision and the reasons for it; and, secondly, by allowing the applicant to make both written and oral representations on it.This was supported in Banks v Kingston-Upon-Thames RLBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1443 on the ‘objective’ of Reg 8(2).The meaning of ‘deficiency’ was set out by Carnwath LJ in Hall… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
In that event the applicant’s rights are reinforced in two ways: first, by requiring the reviewing officer to give advance notice of a proposed adverse decision and the reasons for it; and, secondly, by allowing the applicant to make both written and oral representations on it.This was supported in Banks v Kingston-Upon-Thames RLBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1443 on the ‘objective’ of Reg 8(2).The meaning of ‘deficiency’ was set out by Carnwath LJ in Hall… [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
Kingston East Realty Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:29 am
Hunt v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:57 am
The First–tier Tribunal Judge also relied on her findings that the Appellant had no family or personal connections anywhere in Jamaica, and no familiarity with anywhere outside of Kingston. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
Kingston Tech. [read post]
The Paramount Interest in Seeing that Patent Monopolies . . . are Kept Within their Legitimate Scope
31 Jan 2014, 5:05 am
Kingston Technology Co., Inc., 695 F.3d 1348 (Fed. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
. 'Nerd' fails to gain an entry, notwithstanding the consideration of this word by Lords Justices Jacob and Pill in the patent appeal of Rockwater v Technip (here). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:31 pm
– Milwaukee lawyer Bernand Bobber of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Net Neutrality V.3: What We Know So Far – Arlington, VA lawyer Paul Feldman of Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth on the firm’s CommLawBlog NYU Grad Students On Verge Of Labor Strike – Atlanta attorney Cary Burke of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Labor Relations Today Bidders: Pay Attention to Your Clocks, Fax Machines and… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 5:46 pm
But to take our mind off of it, we have legal news, not just here in the Top 10, but also over on LXBN, where Anne Yuengert talks same-sex marriage and the workplace and Zosha writes on the Facebook v. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 4:10 am
It contains a cogent plea by veteran alternative innovation protection expert William Kingston for more use of an "incontestable protection" principle, modelled on the US orphan drug legislation, in the encouragement of innovation by smaller companies. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:52 am
I send thanks to Attorney Ann Farias of the O'Donnell Law Offices in Kingston, PA for advising me this decision. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
Background Asco was hired by the City of Kingston to renovate a theatre. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:05 am
Brian Cathcart is Professor of Journalism at Kingston University London This post originally appeared on Byline Investigates and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Cantafio v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
But front-line couriers fear they’ll be the ones left hurtingOhio Judge accused of failing to follow COVID-19 recommendations is removed from 2 trialsStates Plan to Accuse Google of Illegal Monopoly in Online Ads French court finds 14 accomplices in 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack guiltyCity of Paris Fined Nearly $110,000 for Appointing Too Many Women Facebook Takes the Gloves Off in Feud With AppleRussia banned from using name, flag, anthem at Olympics, world championships through 2022In landmark… [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 7:38 am
That amount has been reduced to $75,000.The case is Legg v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am
In other words, the question was whether the judgment of Gage LJ in Tetteh v Kingston Upon Thames Royal London Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1775 survived Hotak; ie that it remained correct in asserting that a review decision had to be read as a whole and that there was no reason for the reviewer to go further than stating the test and the overall finding. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:15 am
” With these words Lord Sumption begins the systematic demolition of an edifice first constructed in 1908 in Poulton v Adjustable Cover and Boiler Block Co, and subsequently extended in Coflexip v Stolt (2004), Unilin v Berry (2007) and in this case, Virgin v Zodiac (2009). [read post]
