Search for: "L.R."
Results 181 - 200
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 11:47 am
Purushottam Tiwari (Deceased) by L.Rs., this Court held (at pages 188-189) as under : ........The appellate court has jurisdiction to reverse or affirm the findings of the trial court. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:34 am
Two years later, on January 13, 2005, L.R. was born in Romania. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:44 pm
Goodfellow (1870), L.R. 5 Q.B. 549 (Eng. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:15 am
L.R. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Raghubir Singh (Dead) by L.Rs. (1989) 2 SCC 754, this Court held that the plea for reconsideration is not to be entertained merely because the petitioner chooses to reagitate the points concluded by the earlier decision in Sub-committee on Judicial Accountability. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
According to the case details on the Supreme Court website, the hearing will consider the Rule itself by addressing its limitations and its compatibility with the rule against double proof which states that there can only be one dividend in respect of what is substantially the same debt (In re Oriental Commercial Bank (1871) L.R. 7 Ch. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:43 am
Fletcher (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330) and nuisance as well as negligence. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:13 am
L.R. (3d) 217, it was held that it was an error in principle for the trial judge not to have taken into account negative contingencies associated with childbirth and child-rearing in assessing future income loss for a female plaintiff who had indicated, before she suffered her injury, that she wished to have several children and would consider staying home with them… [65] To some extent, I agree with the reasoning of the Alberta Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
L.R. 37 the configuration of various interests require to have regard not only to the interests of the accused: “While the law of Scotland has always very properly regarded fairness to an accused person as being an integral part of the administration of justice, fairness is not a unilateral consideration. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
In Kashi Nath (Dead) through L.Rs. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
L.R. 7.1(a),(c)) mandate that memoranda of law in support and in opposition be filed for almost all motions. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
L.R. 7.1(a),(c)) mandate that memoranda of law in support and in opposition be filed for almost all motions. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
L.R. 7.1(a),(c)) mandate that memoranda of law in support and in opposition be filed for almost all motions. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
Law Lessons from KAREN C. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
L.R. 3-1. . . . [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
L.R. 7 .1.2( a) ("Unless otherwise ordered, all requests for relief shall be presented to the Court by motion. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Phoola (dead) by L.Rs. and others, AIR 1976 SC 844; 1976(1) SCC 852 .Precedents which enunciate rules of law form the foundation of administration of justice. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:17 pm
L.R. (4th) 10). [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:26 am
L.R. 541 (Winter 2011), and it's by Prof. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:24 am
L.R. 1523 (2006) is a good use of capital? [read post]
