Search for: "LB v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm by SJM
We are all aware that there is no general entitlement to permanent accommodation via the Part VII route (R v Brent ex p Awua). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm by SJM
We are all aware that there is no general entitlement to permanent accommodation via the Part VII route (R v Brent ex p Awua). [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am by NL
An odd appeal on an adverse possession case, of no legal interest per se, but entertaining on the facts.Devanney v LB Hounslow [2012] EWCA Civ 1660 [not on baili yet. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am by NL
An odd appeal on an adverse possession case, of no legal interest per se, but entertaining on the facts.Devanney v LB Hounslow [2012] EWCA Civ 1660 [not on baili yet. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
With the context of out of borough placements and the post Localism Act situation, this seemed worth considering and quoting in detail.Arfon Abdi v LB Waltham Forest. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
With the context of out of borough placements and the post Localism Act situation, this seemed worth considering and quoting in detail.Arfon Abdi v LB Waltham Forest. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm by NL
If it had been intended to exclude disrepairs caused by the tenant, the covenant would or should have stated this in terms. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm by NL
If it had been intended to exclude disrepairs caused by the tenant, the covenant would or should have stated this in terms. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:43 am by Venkat
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] In re Hulu Privacy Litigation, C 11-03764 LB (N.D. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:11 pm by uwlegalscholarship
Again, there is a charge of $8.95-16.95 (price is determined by the actual weigh up to 20 lbs.) to send it out via Penfield’s. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:32 am by Nerds in Court
, ~300 lbs., father of 5 (including twin girls born earlier this year) has been in the public spotlight, and had brushes with the law, since he was a teenager. [read post]