Search for: "LONG v. PARKER" Results 181 - 200 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
The main, obvious and inescapable criticism is that it takes far too long for tariffs to be decided and they are thus usually very retroactive. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:47 am by Dennis Crouch
One way to see this case is as a battle between Parker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm by admin
” This Proposed Rule set out the enrollment revocation and denial changes CMS planned to implement in an effort to address long-standing program integrity risks that have previously been exploited in the past.[5] A little more than three years after the issuance of the March 2016 Proposed Rule, CMS has now issued its much-anticipated Final Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Program Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm by Robert Liles
” This Proposed Rule set out the enrollment revocation and denial changes CMS planned to implement in an effort to address long-standing program integrity risks that have previously been exploited in the past.[5] A little more than three years after the issuance of the March 2016 Proposed Rule, CMS has now issued its much-anticipated Final Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Program Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment… [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
It has a long and storied history, going back all the way to the Civil War.[1]  Prior to 1986, the statute was only infrequently utilized by law enforcement. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Golub v Shalik, Morris & Co., LLP  2019 NY Slip Op 32589(U) September 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158055/2017 Judge: Barbara Jaffe is worth reading, simply for the long description of all the argument for/against malpractice, continuing representation, damages in a tax case, the application of future estate taxes and how a court reads this all. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
Parker, the earlier precedent on which it is based), Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
The Supreme Court of Canada @SCC_eng, the Federal Court of Appeal @FedCourtApp_en  and the Federal Court @FedCourt_CAN_enhave long had Twitter accounts – with little discernable impact one way or another. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:34 pm by Tom Zagorsky
The five required sections/categories are as follows: (i) Introduction; (ii) Relationships and Services; (iii) Fees, Costs, Conflicts and Standards of Conduct; (iv) Disciplinary History; and (v) Additional Information. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]