Search for: "LORD V. STATE"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
Lord Hamblen (with whom Lord Hodge, Lord Kitchin and Lord Sales agreed) gave the majority opinion of the court, with Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
Lord knows I better. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
” The Right Honorable speaker vehemently stated that Uganda will show the world that it does not condone darkness. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 8:34 am
References below to legislation are to ITEPA unless stated otherwise. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The House of Lords in SAAMCo v York Montague set out the principle that a wrongdoer is unlikely to be liable for all the consequences of their actions unless justified by special policy. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
On the moment the news broke about Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Masterpiece Cakeshop again In Scardina v Masterpiece Cakeshop Inc (CO Ct App. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 pm
” Lord Mansfield spoke so. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
From Corso Ventures LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 3:13 am
Lord Briggs dissented. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
The court held that the display violated the separation of church and state and gave the municipality six months to remove it. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Dykes v. [read post]
