Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 8,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
In Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:55 am
At issue in the two related cases is whether the Eighth Circuit abrogated the Hatch-Waxman Amendments by allowing state tort liability for failure to warn in direct contravention of the Act’s requirement that a generic drug’s labeling be the same as the labeling approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the listed (or branded) drug. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:40 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 3:21 am
Thus Hopper v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 2:02 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada recently upheld in Katz Group Canada Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
On November 3, the Supreme Court will review the case Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:09 am
Nowak v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:25 pm
Department of Agriculture, and the difference between the treatment of "Harvestland" chickens and those of competitors stated claims for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, fraud in the inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express warranty, according to the federal district court in Newark (Hemy v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:21 am
While it has been long established that FDA-approved or mandated labeling preempts state failure-to-warn claims, some courts have decided that sometimes labeling just isn’t enough, never mind what FDA thinks. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:07 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 5:54 am
In the case of Cohen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:36 am
Caronia, 703 F.3d 149 (2nd Cir. 2012) and Amarin Pharm, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:27 pm
Case citation: Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Green Drop on Bottled Water Label Not Misleading for “Reasonable Consumer”This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.No reasonable consumer would be misled to think that the green drop on the label of Fiji bottled water represented a third party organization’s endorsement or that Fiji water was environmentally superior to that of the competition, a California appellate court has ruled.A purchaser attempted to assert violations of… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
’” And, in Jones v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 9:37 pm
Teva and Amarin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 4:38 pm
Description/Success Story/Testimonial: Represented whistleblower in an action under False Claims Act alleging off-label marketing and REMS violations, resulting in a $58 million settlement. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
Sony Third Circuit Says Google Isn’t State Actor–Jayne v. [read post]
