Search for: "Lady v State"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
His judgment stated that “the harm caused by the repudiation of the promise is not the same as the detriment suffered. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 3:00 pm
The prior rules protected transgender individuals and those who had accessed abortion services.(9) In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:31 am
Tinsley v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Lady Hale also agreed that the Court in Bressol did not accept the A-G’s reasoning. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:11 am
These Regulations enable civil proceedings in UK courts for breaches of the EC Regulations, and state that compensation awarded may include sums for injury to feelings. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:39 pm
The case is Wilson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Never underestimate the allure of the lunch lady. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:36 am
A majority of the Supreme Court (Lady Hale dissenting) dismissed the appeal. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
The Secretary of State appealed to the Upper Tribunal. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 2:34 am
Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment, with which the other justices agreed. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
Supreme Court In a leapfrog appeal, the Supreme Court, comprising Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Sumption, Hughes and Toulson, heard submissions on 26 and 27 January 2016. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:59 am
The post Case Comment – Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
