Search for: "Lake v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 1,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
United States, another case litigated by Pacific Legal Foundation. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The Supreme Court will review the test for determining whether wetlands are entitled to receive protection under the Clean Water Act as “waters of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stayed injunctions against implementing the rule. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
United States, which held that the Clean Water Act does not regulate all wetlands but did not produce a majority for the governing standard. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am by Michael C. Dorf
Omit the facts portion of the memo in your answer.Question 3As you know, a House of Representatives select committee charged with investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol has issued subpoenas for records and testimony from various actors, including the Archivist of the United States (as custodian of executive records), former officials in the Trump administration, and informal advisors to the President. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:52 pm by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.htmlTwo petitions for certiorari were filed last week on 12/3/21: United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 11:59 pm by Kristi L. Wolff and Jaclyn M. Metzinger
Unilever United States, Inc., the Northern District of California denied class certification in a suit alleging that Breyers’ Natural Vanilla Ice Cream contained only natural vanilla. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 1:41 pm by Unknown
United States (Tribal Courts; Double Jeopardy; Court of Indian Offenses) Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:34 am by gabrielagendreau
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]