Search for: "Lambeth v. Lambeth"
Results 181 - 200
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
(d) the decision of the House of Lords in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 had attempted to deal with these two ECtHR cases and had concluded that the right of a public authority landlord to enforce a claim for possession would, in most cases, automatically be justified under Art. 8(2). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:45 pm
It is true that this marks an important departure from the three relatively recent cases where the House of Lords held that it was not open to a residential occupier, against whom possession was being sought by a local authority, to raise a proportionality argument under article 8: Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 AC 983, Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10; , and Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008]… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
That position had been further explained by Kay v LB Lambeth; Price v Leeds CC [2006] UKHL 10. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
That position had been further explained by Kay v LB Lambeth; Price v Leeds CC [2006] UKHL 10. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
“Lambeth ‘Calls’, Lambeth I.10, and the nature of the Anglican Communion (2), 29 July 2022. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
The review officer’s decision was upheld on s.204 appeal to Lambeth County Court, where HHJ Welchman found whether in was employment or not was a matter of fact, and the decision was not perverse. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
In Babakandi v Westminster CC [2011] EWHC 1756 (Admin), Mr Babakandi made a bold challenge to Westminster's allocation scheme (bold, as in post-Ahmad v Newham LBC) together with other grounds. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
In Babakandi v Westminster CC [2011] EWHC 1756 (Admin), Mr Babakandi made a bold challenge to Westminster's allocation scheme (bold, as in post-Ahmad v Newham LBC) together with other grounds. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
English case law is considered - although not the line of cases from Kay v Lambeth to Doherty. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
Lambeth sought possession against the occupiers, who included Messrs Kay, Constantine, Cole, Greenhalgh, Armstrong, Ballantine, Breschinsky, and Ms Barnett. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 3:26 pm
HHJ Luba QC found that the appellant had a choice whether or not to validate the out of time review by retrospectively agreeing an extension of time (Jabe v Lambeth LBC Feb 2018 Legal Action 45). [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 8:33 am
London Borough of Lambeth [2022] EWHC 1085 (Admin). [read post]
