Search for: "Lambeth v. Lambeth"
Results 181 - 200
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
That latter section had been held to confer a power to provide accommodation in R(W) v Lambeth LBC [2002] 2 All ER 901, even before the insertion of a specific reference to accommodation made by Adoption and Children Act 2002. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
That latter section had been held to confer a power to provide accommodation in R(W) v Lambeth LBC [2002] 2 All ER 901, even before the insertion of a specific reference to accommodation made by Adoption and Children Act 2002. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:29 am
The case is Chesterton Global Ltd v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:30 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Jones, R (on the application of) v The Parole Board [2010] EWHC 2462 (Admin) (08 October 2010) A, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Rev 1) [2010] EWHC 2439 (Admin) (07 October 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Vossloh Aktiengesellschaft v Alpha Trains (UK) Ltd. [2010] EWHC 2443 (Ch) (05 October 2010) Southampton City Council v Southampton Medina Mosque Trust Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 2376 (Ch)… [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:11 am
Meanwhile you may want to have a look at section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. court cases landlord v tennants Yup, we’ve got those here. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(See this earlier post for the text of the original Constitution adopted in 1789, and see in particular Article V thereof.)Article I of the original Constitution established a "General Convention" -- a representative body composed of delegates ("deputies") elected and sent by the member dioceses, and (in a separate chamber, or "House") the bishops who headed up each member Diocese. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:25 am
As a point of comparison, I thought about Southwark LBC v Jackson and Jackson, Lambeth County Court 27 January 2009 (pre-dating Forcelux). [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
Lambeth sought possession against the occupiers, who included Messrs Kay, Constantine, Cole, Greenhalgh, Armstrong, Ballantine, Breschinsky, and Ms Barnett. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The ordinary rules of precedent continue to apply and judges continue to be bound by Lambeth LBC v Kay and Doherty v Birmingham CC (Kay v Lambeth LBC at [43]–[44]; [50]; [62]; [121]; [175]; [178]; [213]) unless and until the Supreme Court rules otherwise. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:01 am
In his view, the relevant principles were established by Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth Borough Council [2006] 2 AC 465 [44], in which it was held that the doctrine of precedent required the domestic courts to follow a House of Lords decision where there was a conflict between that authority and a judgment of the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:21 am
Court of Apeal (Civil Division) Mentmore International Ltd & Ors v Abbey Healthcare (Festival) Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 761 (07 July 2010) Gale & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 759 (07 July 2010) Revenue and Customs v Smallwood & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 778 (08 July 2010) London Borough of Brent v Corcoran & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 774 (08 July 2010) Davies & Ors v Pay [2010] EWCA Civ 752 (08 July 2010) Al Jedda… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
LB Lambeth v Emeter [2010] EWCA Civ 527 [not on Baili, note from a transcript] This was a renewed permission to appeal hearing which foundered on Mr Emeter's complete lack of Agatha Christie-esque skills in plotting, detail and making evidence ambiguous. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
LB Lambeth v Emeter [2010] EWCA Civ 527 [not on Baili, note from a transcript] This was a renewed permission to appeal hearing which foundered on Mr Emeter's complete lack of Agatha Christie-esque skills in plotting, detail and making evidence ambiguous. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Lambeth County Court 6/11/2009 The Claimant, aged 17 applied as homeless. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Lambeth County Court 6/11/2009 The Claimant, aged 17 applied as homeless. [read post]
