Search for: "Lathams Limited" Results 181 - 200 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 4:56 am by Broc Romanek
As for my thoughts, I suspect this new policy operating in conjunction with the new reverse merger limitations will limit the number of 'not ready for prime time' companies seeking to access the U.S. markets (and may disproportionately affect companies from certain countries). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Dr Damian Tambini reflects on the Inquiry’s procedural limitations in this piece for the LSE Media Policy blog. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
., office of Latham & Watkins LLP, also with 25 minutes of time, will argue for Prometheus. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
., office of Latham & Watkins LLP, also with 25 minutes of time, will argue for Prometheus. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Kedar
In that tradition, both Chief Justice Roberts and Latham & Watkins partner Maureen Mahoney argued their first cases as appointed amici. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:28 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Stephen Latham at Yale has a new bioethics blog. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:10 am by Usha Rodrigues
 You're familiar with these markers: Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Latham & Watkins, LLP, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC (my firma mater). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
However, the City argues that this waiver of immunity from suit is limited and that "[t]he scope of the waiver in connection with a breach of the [Settlement Agreement] should be limited to the initial scope of the waiver. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 pm by Adam Thierer
Kaiser, a U.S. and EU antitrust lawyer and partner with Latham & Watkins LLP, has just released an important essay on a topic I have devoted much time to here over the years: the debate over the relative advantages of “open” vs. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:57 pm by Jessica Erickson
A recent memorandum by Latham & Watkins reports that more than 70 companies have included these provisions in their bylaws or charters. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:40 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Board hired outside counsel (the Latham & Watkins firm) which investigated and concluded that the activity was taking place as the employee reported. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by Larry Bodine
The roundtable's proposal to the commission was signed by general counsel or risk management counsel from 23 firms around the US, including such legal giants as Nixon Peabody, O'Melveny & Myers, Baker & McKenzie, Latham & Watkins, and Bryan Cave. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:00 am by John Heckman
I pay $10 a month and have yet to exceed the page limit. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:37 am by David Lat
OMM and Latham’s end of year bonuses killed Gibson’s, and now they’re apparently doing some major foot-dragging on spring bonuses, as well. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:58 pm by Zoe Tillman
Time Warner, represented by Alexander Maltas of Washington’s Latham & Watkins, argued that the subpoenas were too burdensome. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:53 pm by David Lat
rule.If a non-NYC firm like Freshfields is paying spring bonuses, why shouldn’t we see spring / supplemental bonuses from places like Kirkland & Ellis, Gibson Dunn, Latham & Watkins, Sidley Austin, or O’Melveny & Myers? [read post]