Search for: "Lemley v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 12:11 pm
Electronics v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Attempts to give certainty—but sometimes what you think is a clear definition becomes more complex, as in Apple v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
In a timeline of self-execution, comes after Missouri v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
On the one hand, states can expand federal IP rights beyond the scope allowed by federal law – for instance, by sanctioning contract rules that restrict buyers' use of copyrighted materials (held enforceable in ProCD v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:33 am
Faced with a terrible Supreme Court decision that effectively overruled Diamond v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
Asay ("This Article disaggregates open innovation communities and assesses the actual risks that patents pose to different categories of participants in open innovation communities.")Why Technology Customers Are Being Sued En Masse for Patent Infringement & What Can Be Done, by Colleen V. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Molea, 201… http://t.co/7bU2rwzcKn -> Mark Lemley Asks: Are Short Patent Trials a Rush to Judgment? [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
Derivative of What? [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:38 pm
Mark Lemley (Stanford) argues that Mayo still holds weight: "if I were a biotech patent owner I wouldn't be celebrating just yet. cDNA patents are easier to design around, and under Prometheus v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
To be clear, Professor Lemley is the U.S. patent law expert, in general. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
The study uses data provided by Lex Machina (which also provided data for a US Government Accountability Office study on the same issue - a comment based on the GAO's data can be found here), a company which specialises in collecting and analysing IP litigation data (founded by Professor Mark Lemley at Stanford University). [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
Accordingly, Solum and Chiang challenge the effectiveness of the solutions proposed by previous studies, which focused upon the tools to be used for interpretation (which suggested looking to unbiased third-party sources such as dictionaries and encyclopaedias, to the patentee’s own usage in the patent specification, or to expert testimony), and reject the idea that claim text be innately defective (see Burk and Lemley here). [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
USPS v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:31 am
Individual Inventor v. [read post]
