Search for: "Lewis v. U. S" Results 181 - 200 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2009, 11:00 pm
David Nimmer, In the Shadow of the Emperor: The Hatam Sofer’s Copyright Rulings, (The Torah u-Madda Journal, 2009). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 20 March 2024, Steyn J handed down judgement in the defendant’s application to strike out the claim in the case of Bridgen v Hancock [2024] EWHC 623 (KB). [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:36 pm by Charles Miller
Generations of law students, many of them future public defenders, were inspired by GIDEON'S TRUMPET, a 1964 book by New York Times’ legal reporter Anthony Lewis, describing the story behind Gideon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Lewis, Comedy or Tragedy: The Tale of Diversity Jurisdiction Removal and The One-Year, 62 SMU L. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Lewis, Comedy or Tragedy: The Tale of Diversity Jurisdiction Removal and The One-Year, 62 SMU L. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  Under Conte’s omniforeseeability analysis, why not? [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2024 judgment on meaning was handed down by HHJ Lewis in Unity Plus Healthcare Ltd v Clay & Ors (Re Preliminary Issues) [2024] EWHC 1278 (KB). [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Privacy, Remedies and Comity: The Emerging Problem of Global Injunctions and Some Preliminary Thoughts On How Best to Address It, Part V, Chapter 19 in Comparative Privacy and Defamation 307-328 (András Koltay & Paul Wragg eds, Edward Elgar Publishing 2020), U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3723948, Ronald J. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Canada The Michael Geist blog covered the landmark decision by the Federal Court in the case of Blacklock’s Reports v Attorney General of Canada. [read post]
Furthermore, the taxpayer’s mental intent is not relevant to challenging a state tax authority’s assessment because the taxpayer’s mental intent is not relevant to the tax obligation. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 11:24 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, such ploys are an F-U to constituents who critically depend on Section 230 to achieve their life goals. [read post]