Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 181 - 200 of 20,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2019, 3:05 pm by Eric Goldman
The court says: The only pleaded basis for GoDaddy’s knowledge that the Website would be used to infringe is the Li Defendants’ conduct using other websites and the Prior Action. [read post]
To do so, the court said, would be to hold “defendants liable as having aided and abetted each and every ISIS terrorist act committed anywhere in the world. [read post]
30 May 2020, 4:17 am by Mavrick Law Firm
For an employer to be liable for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the employee must show the adverse action (the decision to terminate) was made because of the employee’s protected activity (the submission of discrimination complaint). [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:08 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Plaintiff brought suit against the Defendant because she had not received any of the repayment. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:03 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Plaintiff brought suit against the Defendant because she had not received any of the repayment. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:26 am by James Innocent
The post Is Viva Tacoland Partly Liable for Its Employee’s Alleged Crime? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 9:41 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Earlier this summer, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that a land surveyor was not liable for injuries suffered by a man who tripped and fell on a wooden stake used to mark the property’s boundaries. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 9:41 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Earlier this summer, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that a land surveyor was not liable for injuries suffered by a man who tripped and fell on a wooden stake used to mark the property’s boundaries. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 6:36 pm by Matthew Lerner
 The defendant landlord argued that he was not liable because the incident did not occur on his property.The Third Department agreed with Supreme Court, noting that the defendant had knowledge of the dog's vicious propensities and had an adequate opportunity to control the premises and confine the dogs. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
By the time of trial, the directors had been dropped as defendants and the officers had settled, leaving only TransCanada as a defendant. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
By the time of trial, the directors had been dropped as defendants and the officers had settled, leaving only TransCanada as a defendant. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:15 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A recent case decided by one state’s supreme court illustrates the trouble one plaintiff had in naming the proper party. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:15 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A recent case decided by one state’s supreme court illustrates the trouble one plaintiff had in naming the proper party. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 8:20 am
A dog’s owner may not be held liable for taking reasonable actions to defend themselves or others against harm. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
These three defendants moved to dismiss the case on the grounds that they could not be held individually liable to the plaintiffs. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
For example, a Pennsylvania Court of Appeals recently ruled in favor of a woman who was injured by a defective dog leash purchased on Amazon, deciding that Amazon was liable, and courts in other states have referenced this ruling in their deliberations on other defective product cases in which Amazon was named as a defendant. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 10:27 am
Typically, they also persuasively raise an alternate causation theory in which the defendant is not liable. [read post]