Search for: "Light v. Lang"
Results 181 - 194
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 3:15 am
Howard v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
(As Amended) A time keeping and displaying wrist mountable watch having a flashlight mounted in the case thereof, said flashlight comprising: a power supply for supplying electrical power to said flashlight, said power supply electrically connected to at least one light source, and time delay means for automatically extinguishing said light source after a fixed time delay following the energization of said light source by the electrical deenergization of said… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:10 am
As we discussed last month, the MPEP mandates the application of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:10 am
As we discussed last month, the MPEP mandates the application of Phillips v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
According claim terms their plain meaning (i.e., ordinary and customary consistent with MPEP 2111.01 citing Phillips v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
See MPEP 2240; Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:36 am
Lang and R.G. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
With respect to the issue of NYCM's opportunity to contest the merits of the underlying action, the Second Department noted: Furthermore, while an insurance carrier that knowingly chooses not to participate in an underlying action "may litigate only the validity of its disclaimer and cannot challenge the liability or damages determination underlying the judgment" (Lang v Hanover Ins. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
My prior practice experience includes working as an attorney with Quarles & Brady Streich Lang, LLP (9/2001-3/2003), Office of the Arizona Attorney General (1/2006-10/2006), and Greenberg Traurig, LLP (5/2004-1/2006 & 10/2006-10/2007). [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Lynn, MA; Robert Daigle, President) Applied Light Manufacturing, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:37 pm
NYC Transit Authority v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:27 pm
There is nothing therefore apart from the offence itself to satisfy the criteria in Lang. [read post]
